Former U.S. President Donald Trump has stirred controversy by suggesting a «National Day of Violence,» an idea that has quickly faced backlash from various organizations and members of society. The proposal, which Trump introduced during a rally, calls for designating a day when citizens are allowed to use force as a way to «restore order» and address crime across the country.

At the rally, Trump voiced his frustration over rising crime rates in numerous American cities. He suggested that a «National Day of Violence» could enable citizens, alongside law enforcement, to «take back» the streets and confront criminals, gangs, and any threats to public safety.
“We’ve been held back for too long. Having one day a year where we can say ‘enough,’ and where ordinary citizens can act with full strength to defend our country, would send a powerful message to criminals and our enemies,” Trump said. His remarks sparked swift criticism from politicians, human rights advocates, and public safety experts, who called the idea reckless and dangerous. Civil rights groups warned that such a day would only lead to greater chaos and conflict, potentially escalating violence even among law-abiding citizens.
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among those who condemned the idea, saying, “Trump is playing with fire. Encouraging violence is never the answer to reducing crime. This only puts more lives at risk, particularly in vulnerable communities.”
Criminal justice experts also cautioned that the proposal could worsen tensions in cities already grappling with racial and social divides, leading to civil unrest and undermining trust in law enforcement. Dr. James Cavanaugh, an expert in criminology, remarked, «Violence begets more violence. Rhe toric like this can destabilize society, and the last thing we need is to encourage people to solve problems with weapons.»
In addition to the political and emotional reactions, legal experts raised questions about whether such a proposal would even be possible under U.S. law. The Constitution prohibits incitement to violence, and legal protections ensure the safety and rights of all citizens. A «National Day of Violence» would likely violate these fundamental principles.
Constitutional lawyers have pointed out that this idea, if pursued, would conflict with numerous federal and state laws. Civil rights attorney Gloria Parker emphasized, “There is no place in our legal system for a proposal that promotes violence among citizens. What Trump is suggesting goes against the very core of law and order.”
While Trump’s proposal has been met with widespread disapproval, it fits a pattern of using provocative rhetoric to rally his base. Throughout his presidency and political career, Trump has frequently used concerns about crime and public safety as central issues to engage his supporters.
Some political commentators believe this latest proposal is aimed at energizing his most hardline supporters, particularly those who advocate for gun rights and tougher approaches to crime.
Though the idea of a «National Day of Violence» has been largely rejected and deemed both legally and morally unacceptable, the debate over how to tackle crime in the U.S. continues. Trump’s proposal seems more likely to deepen divisions within an already polarized society, offering little in the way of practical solutions. While the future of this idea remains unclear, it is evident that violence will not be the answer to restoring order in the country.

